Sunday, 18 found in the magazine "The Magazine" this paragraph in an article by chef Santi Santamaría over ham:
sadly is well known and popular " naturalistic fallacy" in which everything that exists in nature without a human hand is good in essence because of the act itself and to which many of his followers all manufactured artificially by Human beings tend to be bad, harmful or potentially dangerous. Through this fallacy the chef make the mistake of considering the concept of "chemical" everything that does not come directly from nature. A mistake too unfortunately common.
Chemistry is considered "the science of materials" because what precisely is to study their composition. In all, not just those created or synthesized by human action. And is that everything in nature is composed of chemical compounds. People like Mr. Santamaría, uses the word "chemicals" to refer to the compounds made by human being, consciously or not, using it inappropriately and giving it a darker meaning and extremely manipulative. Because there is no fertilizer or chemical pesticides are not unless it is used in organic farming some kind of system ferlilización and pest elimination merely physical component (using, for example, a driving force or other physical action) if there quealgo well. A pesticide made from a solution of garlic, as I have ever heard of any environmentalist who advocated natural pesticides, would be just as "chemical" one made in a specialist firm. Mr. Santamaría
should perhaps choose his words better, after appropriate illustration to get away from the common mistake of those who constantly appeal to the naturalistic fallacy and refer to what he criticized as artificial fertilizers and pesticides , term also is opposed by simple meaning much better than arguing under the term "natural." The reason for this constant misuse of the word "chemistry" is due to ignorance, lack of information, but chemistry is one of the basic sciences, and the positioning of the alternative naturalistic and away from basic sciences may have much to do, putting Malpensa.
And I guess that's the mistake knowledge on everything related chemistry which ultimately leads to the contradiction ...
... a natural therapy is homeopathy? I sincerely believe that people who like this whole world of alternative and natural need seriously stop and think about what it means to "natural therapy". Because of the first words of the famous chef seems natural to assume that he is all out of the earth and mother nature without a human mind so that, keeping to what the hell it is natural homeopathic therapy? Where in the world or universe and how long Mother Nature gave us the infinitesimal dilutions prepared initially substances toxic? Are there rivers whose waters have been the dilution of other multi-phase element and heated up to the final preparation? Is not the development of a homeopathic potion, or else homeopathic pill, when a curious paradox of pellets dispensed into a complete human intervention process from beginning to end, in concept and in its preparation (regardless of its ineffectiveness or not)? And if so ....¿ therapy is not entirely artificial as the significance of this term as opposed to "natural" Santamaria himself gives us to understand in your paragraph, and inclined to negative for the same reason?
We are accustomed to earning a living with naturism brandish the natural fallacy always to score points with their customer market. It is obvious and logical that homeopaths take the opportunity to jump on the bandwagon and take advantage those who are confused to consider "alternative" synonymous with "natural." What happens is that in this case itself is a victim Santamaría while crier system fallacies, errors and contradictions that the lords of alternative therapies for constant disinformation exercise of his faithful followers.
When it comes to meat, we must not forget that there are organic meats, the adjective is used to designate products of agriculture and livestock that have been cultivated and bred natural methods without chemical fertilizers or pesticides. The animals were fed with grains and legumes are considered environmentally friendly, and have been treated with natural methods such as homeopathy and herbal medicine, and is more than most.It's a shame how in Mr. Santamaría incurred on a fallacy, a big mistake and a contradiction usual inexplicably in one hour parafillo to explain something as simple as the term "organic meats," which is to illustrate a bit as usual all pseudoscientific nonsense just chained in one way or another.
sadly is well known and popular " naturalistic fallacy" in which everything that exists in nature without a human hand is good in essence because of the act itself and to which many of his followers all manufactured artificially by Human beings tend to be bad, harmful or potentially dangerous. Through this fallacy the chef make the mistake of considering the concept of "chemical" everything that does not come directly from nature. A mistake too unfortunately common.
Chemistry is considered "the science of materials" because what precisely is to study their composition. In all, not just those created or synthesized by human action. And is that everything in nature is composed of chemical compounds. People like Mr. Santamaría, uses the word "chemicals" to refer to the compounds made by human being, consciously or not, using it inappropriately and giving it a darker meaning and extremely manipulative. Because there is no fertilizer or chemical pesticides are not unless it is used in organic farming some kind of system ferlilización and pest elimination merely physical component (using, for example, a driving force or other physical action) if there quealgo well. A pesticide made from a solution of garlic, as I have ever heard of any environmentalist who advocated natural pesticides, would be just as "chemical" one made in a specialist firm. Mr. Santamaría
should perhaps choose his words better, after appropriate illustration to get away from the common mistake of those who constantly appeal to the naturalistic fallacy and refer to what he criticized as artificial fertilizers and pesticides , term also is opposed by simple meaning much better than arguing under the term "natural." The reason for this constant misuse of the word "chemistry" is due to ignorance, lack of information, but chemistry is one of the basic sciences, and the positioning of the alternative naturalistic and away from basic sciences may have much to do, putting Malpensa.
And I guess that's the mistake knowledge on everything related chemistry which ultimately leads to the contradiction ...
... a natural therapy is homeopathy? I sincerely believe that people who like this whole world of alternative and natural need seriously stop and think about what it means to "natural therapy". Because of the first words of the famous chef seems natural to assume that he is all out of the earth and mother nature without a human mind so that, keeping to what the hell it is natural homeopathic therapy? Where in the world or universe and how long Mother Nature gave us the infinitesimal dilutions prepared initially substances toxic? Are there rivers whose waters have been the dilution of other multi-phase element and heated up to the final preparation? Is not the development of a homeopathic potion, or else homeopathic pill, when a curious paradox of pellets dispensed into a complete human intervention process from beginning to end, in concept and in its preparation (regardless of its ineffectiveness or not)? And if so ....¿ therapy is not entirely artificial as the significance of this term as opposed to "natural" Santamaria himself gives us to understand in your paragraph, and inclined to negative for the same reason?
We are accustomed to earning a living with naturism brandish the natural fallacy always to score points with their customer market. It is obvious and logical that homeopaths take the opportunity to jump on the bandwagon and take advantage those who are confused to consider "alternative" synonymous with "natural." What happens is that in this case itself is a victim Santamaría while crier system fallacies, errors and contradictions that the lords of alternative therapies for constant disinformation exercise of his faithful followers.
0 comments:
Post a Comment