How To Clean Sonicare Toothbrush Mold

a healer acquitted of a crime of fraud because the victims had to have found his "gross deception"

He leído una noticia que, si bien en ciertos aspectos que destaco en negritas me deja satisfecho en otros me asusta e inquieta profundamente, principalmente porque pienso que ciertas actividades no puenden en absoluto dejar de ser delictivas por el mero hecho de que las víctimas estuviesen más o menos equipados cultural o intelectualmente para detectarlas como tales. Una sentencia como described in the following text on the one hand it exposes the credibility and seriousness of certain practices, but on the other gives wings to its practitioners to camp without fear in society. Case may not be the first or novelty, and hence the proliferation of such blatant and shameless these cheeky. Anyway, again, the content of the sentence is incomprehensible precisely because it openly acknowledges the fraudulent nature of these activities as stated flatly false and crude, while tolerating trade based on them just as obvious that it is false. And this is dangerous.

If you can sue a tobacco, as is happening constantly in Estates, for example, even with all the information we have from time been on the effects of snuff, there should be less with healers and other scammers because, in addition, critical information that gives our citizens today not is as great as presumed by the court. And there is more to do television for it.

You judge.

The Supreme Court acquitted of fraud to a healer sentenced to two and a half years in prison for engaging in exchange for 18,000 euros to cure a terminal cancer patient. The high court ruling says that "hope is humanly understood, but the magic does not trust may seek the protection of criminal law. "

La Audiencia Provincial de Cádiz Nuria Montero Gallardo sentenced to 2 ½ years in prison and a fine of 8 months with daily quota of 6 euros for a crime of fraud continued as particularly serious because you got two of the children of a cancer patient with metastasis pay him 18,000 euros and a bird to heal his father.

However, the Supreme Court in a ruling that the magistrate has lectured José Antonio Martín Pallín considers that there is no deception enough to condemn her for a crime of fraud, because "the average citizen of our society, has a level of information about these diseases and their characteristics, which can hardly rely on paranormal powers rational trust ".

" It is considered that there is no fraud when the taxpayer comes to mediums, magicians, possessors of occult powers, fortune-tellers or fortune or false soothsayers, whose activities can not be regarded as generators of deception that results in socially acceptable or are the basis for a criminal response. In these cases it is considered that deception is so gross and unacceptable that it inidóneo to erect the foundation of a crime of fraud " says the resolution.

also considered indisputable that the complainants were anxious to serious illness of his father and desperately seeking any treatment that could cure their disease, "but" in the wired world we live in, any average person is in a position to know what are the effects of diseases generically collected under the generic name of cancer ".

Noting that doctors had warned that it was impossible to cure carcinoma suffering father, the high court added that, in this case, was even more difficult deception, because the daughter was City Manager and the child, clinical assistant, although work on construction. " In any case the claim could be channeled through civil if they can demonstrate that they were induced by words or insidious machinations" , proposed the resolution.

In February 2001, two of the children of a terminally ill went to the home of Nuria Montero Gallardo in Jerez de la Frontera, because his aunt had told them he had "powers" and that was healing for a family member yours.

After seeing a photograph of their father told them he could be cured if treatment began within a week in exchange for 18,000 euros, of which discounted customers that cost them a bird called "Inseparable" they bought in Ubrique, because the healer said he needed to sacrifice animals and extract the same organs that were sick father. The methods used for healing appeared to put a candle and a bucket of water in front of the photo of the father.

To get the money, the brothers had to borrow money when it imposed the original sentence were paying. At one point, the daughter became ill and was admitted to the hospital, the healer told him he had passed his father's cancer. In July 2001, the man died.