This is a real scandal. On 19/03/2009 UGT public on its website, the negotiations had made with the Junta de Extremadura to put the selection processes as best you come to them.
Considering that UGT should represent 0.09% of applicants, we can get an idea of \u200b\u200bthe real legitimacy has to be constructed before the ADMON as a partner.
The turbid matter is that as directly requested the administration, which at the height of nepotism, take off the evidence to develop themes come out by lot, which is usually a big problem for the corrupt and plugged in, since it prevents the filtration of the questions days before, it seems that illegal UGT has made during 2008 in a profuse , throughout all the English geography.
Here I discuss what one recognizes UGT: "....
FSP-UGT proposed that the development of issues by drawing is changed by a short questions and keep the course. The Government accepts this proposal.
performing a single test and a single call for category and specialty. Proposal accepted ...."
is, to take the ass out of the development of a drum track, instead, be able to filter the questions days in advance, give directions to relatives of "DESIGNED this DESIGNED ...... this fall that ... fixed ... what you ready .... we practice in the academy this documendo ... "
For those who do not know, we should remember that in 2006, and there is strong evidence that flowering would fall a POI in the examination
UGT AND HOW MUCH THE COURT OF EDUCATORS
NOT HAVE FILED A REPORT ON THE SCOPE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, FOR SCREENING INFORMATION RELATING TO THE TEST Celebracions
... only you know the corrupt hijosdeputa (I mean corrupt in general, not anyone in particular), it is difficult to obtain evidence to bring them to trial and unfit for Civil Service and which have to be dedicated to the very noble and dignified work scrubbing stairs or picking tomatoes in his village.
And why, after this false security, year after year are encouraged to put it a little easier, and this year that the crisis must be thinking that it sucks to leave to chance the first review, and have to make the tortilla in the second, so I suggest you direct that UGT is put questions as (if not suspected, not if the sentences are strong ..) has happened in many corruption cases that appear in the link above, which is an affiliate of UGT mienbro the court, which seems to be that it Delivery of the questions the court, and then runs away Chivas its affiliates, the questions he has chosen to go
And do not run now everyone to take afiliaros UGT to see if it drops something, because that made many in 2006 and those who took the cat to water, were a very restricted circle micro
0 comments:
Post a Comment