by Camilo Ramírez Garza
".. can not watch a series of strange signs or hear a sequence of words
unknown without distorting their perception because of embarrassment first comprehensibility,
underpinned by something known as "Freud
In" The Prince: the clown "Octavio Paz says," Matching that unfolds: I am a
image in my images and every one of them, the show actually confirms
mine ... suddenly, and soon, the agreement is broken, do not recognize myself in what I see and what
recognize. "
Seeing something, you have the illusion that is the subject who ve / includes / defines / controls
that you see (something, something, the world, the other ...), much along the lines of domination "Go and
name, know its laws of res extensa, control, ... however exploit the
object, apparently, what looks and produces, from its apparent passivity
calculated effects on the subject: it is not known to be produced from the encounter with what you see (visit
a museum, seeing something on TV, a look, a meeting) See can be primarily a surprising encounter
be found by something.
Freud appointed-from contributions of psychoanalysis as the "3 rd wound to narcissism
human" (The first two were "The earth is the center of the universe", and raised
by Darwinian evolution ") the fact that" I is not master in his house, "referring to the impossible
agent domination and control course, where speech / define /
control ... there is something (that) they dare speak of him, a truth not known, but
as it owns and organizes the production, the same symptoms, pains, dreams ... like life itself
subject referents with whom he lives, see, loves, dreams, struggles, failures, etc.
. In that sense, the self is pure ignorance, "status" is to wonder what he sees and
sees it, created an idea of \u200b\u200bwhat "The effect of taking a picture" (Lacan, "The
mirror stage ") The fiction is that of an agency that looks and controls, when the constitution is precisely
be a thing that is look, it was regarded: the self is
a look. And I think with the, you look to the self: the experiences are clarified
of what can and can not watch. Hence the realm of "invisible" when someone
to having "in his face" something and not see, at first, then to his surprise
warns that this is not seen, has always been there, but it made him look.
why advertisers are well aware, in making the advertising image is shaped not only
and seeks to capture the look of someone, but you create them.
an analysand tells me: "I like riding a bike, as are other things, car
see some walking others, but a bike is different," Noting the relationship and specific effects
each series machine middle-of-transport-looking. Where the eye is built
throughout the body (machine-body) If "The body is a gift from
language" (Jacques Lacan) then the body is woven in such a purely external and seen
in the social context ("... individual psychology is both social psychology, Freud
) would have to follow the clues to the ways in which the eye / eyes make
seek our social fabric: What if I see and Why not?, what you want to "show"
the other? Just in contexts where the unfortunate proposal Mexico Initiative, is the
of fewer words, words "What is shown-ve and not in the media about what
happens in Mexico?" even for the sake of a supposed "mental health" in the style of Vincent
Fox ("I do not see News for newspapers or depress me) and this, in a historic moment
where, in past elections, the" video scandals acted
a leading role on the national agenda, now deleted eyes
http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com
Twitter: CamiloRamirez_
0 comments:
Post a Comment