Monday, May 9, 2011

Mario Salieri Streaming Vids

What seduces


by Camilo Ramírez Garza

not intend to make an apology for the crime. But to address, are not risk-something that is set aside for various social orders: the seductive object of the crime, that we love, both for those who run it, and for those who observe and follow the work of crime and those who capitalize entertaining with their news.

As its etymology suggests, crime is "cutting, screening, sifting," What is short, but what is thought together? While Rousseau spoke of "breaking the social contract, "we might say that at this level is still considered the place and function of the contract, the act of breaking would be a recognition and a possibility to compensate the broken. In these times, if I may say-no as the contract is broken, it is killed and those who have made a loop through him, and civil society (terrorism: that is what concerns Javier Sicilia "They have broken their code of honor" in his call to the criminals) with a halo of "angelic" abject sublime passion "in the offender, which results in a total master of excessive enjoyment: All power, all the money All women and luxuries. These are the issues of stories and songs of the drug. Ideals, however much you deny it, are the same as the market and good education for many children, youth and adult students, housewives, professionals, public servants. Hence we could say that the criminals is represented "That" shared by the rest that is not running, but keep a list of horror to the crime, while the other "criminal" if it expresses the horror / fascination. "Neurosis is the negative of perversion"
"said Freud.

Paradoxically, celebrates humanity to the left column of bodies, not only because death is "the" ultimate human question: the death of others will bounce towards us, but so too enigmatic to be "beyond" from the near side . Do not perform this function references in talks people assumed that you know someone who knows someone who knows someone who is ... (Narco, deputy mayor, governor, president ...) I-Life-Death-Sex-Crime-Power is a circuit that sustains the existence, leaving it hovering like a crack, which functions as a dark object and which is considered better to keep it refused to do as it is not motor thriving in the world. Do Silvio Berlusconi has not made public something that is "daily bread" of power?

Is not the same element tragic seductive murderer, savior, found both in the work of organized crime as the Mexican federal government business, both with impunity, where once again listed atrocities of various drug lords, and has been the government that has stopped them, in some cases completed and exposing them to the gallows television drama, stained with blood, covered with tickets to the show time? What is it really bothers you, serves both the state of crime? ¿Tener finalmente competencia sobre quien controlar a la ciudadanía? ¿No es acaso el culto al crimen, un retorno al poder supuestamente ilimitado del soberano, aquel que tenía control sobre la muerte? ¿No es acaso el mejor control hacia el ciudadano: sentir que estamos o en las manos del crimen o del estado, los malos y los buenos? ¿Por qué de pronto el quehacer del Estado y del crimen, parecieran tan iguales? Incluso compartiendo la formula: no es solo el narco quien mata ahora, sino también las fuerzas del Estado.

La desconfianza, fatalidad y paranoización de la existencia en los ciudadanos no es solo la de vivir con miedo permanente, efecto de la delincuencia, but an activity that is erotic and fatalistic notion populated by "those who they meet," where even-compare it with what they hear in discussions with friends, is considered a landslide and no escape the chore of criminal: the question of promise of an "x" policy, while taking as a "law of the flesh" (cf. "The narco-empire in Mexico, Juan Villoro) that says that the criminal will, or just run, cutting the element that , convict and execute. In that sense, the purest of irony, what if the logic is exchanged: if politicians met, and the criminals back a little or a lot, politicians, who they say they will finally be in hot air?

http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com

Twitter: CamiloRamirez_

Monday, April 25, 2011

Las Vegas Wedding Lunch Ideas

crime leisure Wisdom

leisure Wisdom [1]

Camilo Ramírez Garza

"... to the mother because we only care about money,

the power, click on "competitiveness" and excessive consumption. "

Javier Sicilia

Leisure is one of the greatest pleasures, and, however paradoxical it may seem- producer of wisdom. Let's stop here, as I mentioned a word, at once majestic and simple, as is "wisdom," and clarify a point : no any school, nor the most prestigious local, national or international that to which everyone wants to apply and be counted among their ranks, with thousands of advisory boards, resources, facilities, history and great halls, that manages to convey wisdom in itself. How so? Just because wisdom is of another order of life experiences and no effect on number of "controlled" environments-style experiments and models of competence, assessed, measured and quantified as industrial processes. At most what schools-kindergarten through college-is knowledge will provide literature and operational style "How to do it", but experiences that have the effect of know-how, hence a second beginning, we might say - of training and in the workplace. That does not mean they are completely negligible classes and schools that grant credentials. Most of the world moves by such logic. However, perhaps the entertainment is also a school, but life (from gr. Skol: leisure time) contingency. After all it is no coincidence that "leisure" keep an etymological connection with the Latin root word "school" Schola.

What leisure has to do with wisdom? It seems paradoxical to relate them, on the contrary to the vision of production as the development of success!, which seeks to accumulate human capital at a time and money. Interesting that you call the common denominator, "capital", two very different things, just the vision of the company and state (biopower) as the Nazis and organized crime, is to reduce the single human figure (%,$, etc.) Leisure is not just the mother of all vices, such as believe, but the context of the occurrences that give rise to creative arts, home to what really matters: the nothingness from which everything arises. For example, we need both, lack. are the ones that function in part as the memory of mankind and questions about what we've become the direction we take. And what about the millions of inventions that arise from the contemplation of the wise inventor.

Leisure also keeps a relationship with the slow, being in the body in the present moment, without urgency or plans full of things to do. We could say that two events that do take full news room: the birth and death. All others can be away, to pretend that we are not, for they do not. That is perhaps what most enjoyable vacation: leave the pre-occupation for the occupation of relaxation and leisure: the pleasure of doing nothing, living the moment. Until, of course, Express rides appear nourished offering sightseeing, walking, story, photo, souvenir, it is impossible not to think that even the relaxation and fun, should be managed, overloaded. Hence, it is not strange need a vacation from the vacation, once you return. Then bet there was also "enjoy the most"

While the technical advances have shortened distances and times, speeding and eficientizandando resources (market values) the body has been saturated with activities, Drop , feel, is a step to rest.

http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com

Twitter: CamiloRamirez_



[1] Article published in The future April 20, 2011, cultural section, p. 3

Friday, April 8, 2011

Nac Jewellers Oddiyanam

The object of the gaze

by Camilo Ramírez Garza


".. can not watch a series of strange signs or hear a sequence of words
unknown without distorting their perception because of embarrassment first comprehensibility,
underpinned by something known as "Freud


In" The Prince: the clown "Octavio Paz says," Matching that unfolds: I am a
image in my images and every one of them, the show actually confirms
mine ... suddenly, and soon, the agreement is broken, do not recognize myself in what I see and what
recognize. "

Seeing something, you have the illusion that is the subject who ve / includes / defines / controls
that you see (something, something, the world, the other ...), much along the lines of domination "Go and
name, know its laws of res extensa, control, ... however exploit the
object, apparently, what looks and produces, from its apparent passivity
calculated effects on the subject: it is not known to be produced from the encounter with what you see (visit
a museum, seeing something on TV, a look, a meeting) See can be primarily a surprising encounter
be found by something.

Freud appointed-from contributions of psychoanalysis as the "3 rd wound to narcissism
human" (The first two were "The earth is the center of the universe", and raised
by Darwinian evolution ") the fact that" I is not master in his house, "referring to the impossible
agent domination and control course, where speech / define /
control ... there is something (that) they dare speak of him, a truth not known, but
as it owns and organizes the production, the same symptoms, pains, dreams ... like life itself
subject referents with whom he lives, see, loves, dreams, struggles, failures, etc.
. In that sense, the self is pure ignorance, "status" is to wonder what he sees and
sees it, created an idea of \u200b\u200bwhat "The effect of taking a picture" (Lacan, "The
mirror stage ") The fiction is that of an agency that looks and controls, when the constitution is precisely
be a thing that is look, it was regarded: the self is
a look. And I think with the, you look to the self: the experiences are clarified
of what can and can not watch. Hence the realm of "invisible" when someone
to having "in his face" something and not see, at first, then to his surprise
warns that this is not seen, has always been there, but it made him look.
why advertisers are well aware, in making the advertising image is shaped not only
and seeks to capture the look of someone, but you create them.

an analysand tells me: "I like riding a bike, as are other things, car
see some walking others, but a bike is different," Noting the relationship and specific effects
each series machine middle-of-transport-looking. Where the eye is built
throughout the body (machine-body) If "The body is a gift from

language" (Jacques Lacan) then the body is woven in such a purely external and seen
in the social context ("... individual psychology is both social psychology, Freud
) would have to follow the clues to the ways in which the eye / eyes make
seek our social fabric: What if I see and Why not?, what you want to "show"
the other? Just in contexts where the unfortunate proposal Mexico Initiative, is the
of fewer words, words "What is shown-ve and not in the media about what
happens in Mexico?" even for the sake of a supposed "mental health" in the style of Vincent
Fox ("I do not see News for newspapers or depress me) and this, in a historic moment
where, in past elections, the" video scandals acted
a leading role on the national agenda, now deleted eyes

http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com
Twitter: CamiloRamirez_
Camilo

Friday, January 21, 2011

Cutlery Brown Marks Removal

Why are we as we are?

Ramírez Garza

"The great secret of psychoanalysis is that there psychogenesis" Lacquer Lacan

insistent question these days, which tries to find some clue to the causes, meanings and
solutions to problems that individuals and society as we face (
the suffering of the subject is part of the group and vice versa). Why are we cry
as we are? is already very general, whether the one person utters a
community. You can respond to the equally barren response "We are as we are because
are as we are "bound to suffer again with the being, and there seems
that has to be" different "to resolve something. Or the "classic"
is due to the loss of values \u200b\u200b"," What if everyone is guilty, that if more budget-
always ask this educational unions-etc. etc. and other common places
not do more than resting joyfully in the guilt of being "the shit" and that we "lack
lot of education, culture and livestock, etc.. and so on. ... And then?

The "Why Whys? "say everything and nothing, are very vague, giving the illusion of
locate a cause (risk factors, etc.). there who knows where at one point in the past, where everything would
started to emerge. Factors that at present, we should "attack" to avoid
well, that is deploying the device of preventive strategies. Which, in more
a sense, only serve to provoke the very thing that was to be avoided: prevention
has the structure of anticipation, set something like its cause, leaving some within and some outside
, operationalizing , standardizing, reducing the figure, the data, discarding others
many possibilities. In pursuing these "red flags" ends up producing.
For example, the motives for war, revolution, etc.
often end up producing it that were supposed to "attack" (Fidel Castro, Calderon, Chavez,
PRI, leftist movements, etc.) In the case of President Calderon, his interest is to prevent deaths
, protect the people, ("To live better," "For the drug does not reach
your children") which produces exactly why I wanted to avoid. "What is what makes policy
life ends by approaching inexorably to its opposite? "asked
Foucault, keeping track of where you stand present invent new positions,
for both the subject and for the community.

As in psychoanalysis, to account for why? have to keep track of how.
In that sense, the question "Why are we as we are? And its variant Why are we
as we are? Be reformulated to How ...? How to enter the present time, leaves a side
moralizing only rends garments, while doing and undoing; those who "eat shit
saints and devils," makes us aim for the tracks, knotted and woven so

involved in my / our discomfort, leaving aside the complaint joyful's "Why are you so?".
That alone is used to screw the other, de-identify the real problem spots.
eg Before the executions, shootings, extortion and kidnappings in Mexico are suffering, the worst is
consider it a "climate" or a "wave of crime", and do not address what specific
modus operandi, staying scared by "narcobanners" without reading your message,
see who hand the target audience and what are their objectives, for example.
both crime and the State, what relationship? Texts as "The Sinaloa cartel:
a history of political use of drug" by Diego Enrique Osorno, and "drug lords"
Isabel Hernandez. Further, or closer, the questions about the veracity of the testimony
their sources, which of course, the authors state, are exercises in critical discourse to analyze
How many? the discomforts shared
propose ways to think and study these criminal activities from a perspective not of the
moral degeneration of society, humans, etc.. but as a business and political
their aims very clear in its purpose and use of information media, which,
advanced societies and individuals of high culture, access and invest, as in any business
.

http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com

Twitter: CamiloRamirez_

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Poems For Adiaper Raffle

Balance Power admits that he deceived his clients




The Government of Australia has forced the company selling the bracelets Miracle Power Balance to recognize by a notice which was published yesterday in the Australian local press that their products do not generate profits for individuals who wear them. "In our advertising we affirm that the Power Balance bracelets improve balance, strength and flexibility. We admit that there is no scientific evidence to support our claims," \u200b\u200brecognizes advertising company. It also ensures that return the purchase amount to all consumers who claim it because they have felt cheated.

The company made this announcement public order for the Australian Consumer and Competition, which concluded that Power Balance trick users did not produce any evidence that the bracelets have beneficial properties beyond the placebo effect. In Spain, the company that markets the Power Balance in November received a fine of 15,000 euros from the Junta de Andalucía for misleading advertising. News

original.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

How To Set My Io Remote




by Camilo Ramírez Garza

The harrowing experience of losing a son in a bloody manner, thousands of mothers
in Mexico, the crime must also have a poor delivery system
of justice, which, using the impunity and corruption, made a veiled way and open
a much greater violence and crime: not assure
minimum safety and protection to its citizens, let alone earlier by preventing crime,
but then the execution processes and penalties for offenders. Ideally:
to be justice not only put in place to each, but served, why not say,
for the rest of family and friends and society in general, particularly the
parents. Finally the death of our loved ones and his crime went unpunished
was sanctioned. That law would meet its goal of being secured, while in other cases
justice waits indefinitely for the style of the series "Cold Case." As is the case
of massive crimes 68y 71 in Mexico, despite forming a specialized committee
these crimes of the past, justice has not occurred.

experiences in many disappearances and abductions, parents request
loudly at least know where his daughter, his son, in order to rest,
homage, mourn his memory. I remember Nelson Vargas repeatedly expressed
so, like thousands of parents all across the country. For
have a body and a grave is the beginning of the break, the duel, both plagued by crime
and the family. When this is lacking, the beloved family is in all places and
while none. When it comes to death for a crime, besides the immense pain
- Words can not! - Adding to experiment in passivity and impotence
a radical act performed by someone known or unknown, in an instant, he
of our life something different, no turning back. "I do not I have nothing to lose, I'm
living dead" (Nelson Vargas)

The whys are multiplying and are, if not silence, a thousand possibilities
explanatory, each is an attempt impossible to capture the meaning of death,
act crazy, criminal, performative, even unknown to those who executed him. If the murderers
acquaintances, they curse the hours, days, places where he saw
his hand, received, talked to him ... he stole the breath dear relative. And if
also heartbreaking crime that can not reach a sentence for the system
should dispense justice, then the pain has no place or time, or measure, and the pain of loss
one be bloody he wanted to add the crime despite the injustice of a poor and corrupt
that rather than protect, punish. Who then will
justice if the state does not guarantee? Does God, school, church, just as before the eyes
accomplices to these same state institutions opera?

Impotence Escobedo Marisela Ortiz, an activist who emerges from the sorrow for the tragedy
the murder of her daughter, Ruby Marisol Frayre, at the hands of a criminal, who
not punish the Mexican justice system, but released, was launched to carry out legitimate activities
protest, demanding justice, finally another criminal act, the braking being finalized
opposite the Palace of Government of Chihuahua, the night of December 16, while
placed a blanket said: "Justice: Governor's privilege. And for my daughter
when? "... Days earlier said: "If I will come to kill that man, to come and murder me here
opposite, shame on government. I have threats from him and his family
.... To come and finish me, let me finish here in front, to see if
ashamed. " The death of Marisela Ortiz Escobedo was another act of protest, complaint
dramatically against the very thing that lovingly by her daughter, was struggling
: impunity for their crimes, perhaps the only way to deal with death.

http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com
Twitter: CamiloRamirez_

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Vc-211a Treiber Windows 7

With motherly love "The sensible and affections"

by Camilo Ramírez Garza

"Psychoanalysis, in this sense, it is conservative, since

teaches the current subject is also permitted to suffer " Slavoj Zizek

Given the insistent comment-commonplace, etiological panacea for all ills- From " That is due to the loss of values \u200b\u200b"- among others. In this every one who "pulls water to his mill, "politicians will ask for more budget, while some teachers blame parents, or those those, etc. We note, first, a predominance of the sensitive, immediate, fleeting, over the affections. While the sensitivity is, say, governed by the charm of the senses (pleasure, comfort, fast, and instantly, the faster, well, nice and cheap, better) affections, according to a psychoanalytic approach have to do more in a position before the (own) desire: to that, just that it could not have done, then cancel it, life itself is canceled, the joke of jokes, dreams, desires, etc.

The market knows any thing relating Pavlovian products (youth, beauty, happiness, joy, power) not only by the Machiavellian market, but something fundamental to humans, the loss of instinctive regulation was necessary to invention of the culture that gave us not only a context but reality itself, from that hole in the "natural" all may be associated with anything. "The body is a gift of language," Lacan. The state "natural" for humans is artificial. Which know psychoanalysts, artists, comedians and advertisers. Hence we see parading deodorants that make the skin appear beautiful women, cell phones make us leave the confinement of not having one, and instantly be connected and have thousands of friends, dishwashing liquid to moisturize skin, to the mother who would not look the hands of a servant, etc.. His logic poses immediate gratification of the senses to the manner of a postmodern superego with its dictatorial rule: You enjoy! The commitment of capital, which apparently no one would give, would be to subtract effort, patience and dedication to the way coffee caffeine is removed (for the beer alcohol, food, calories, sex without sex, war without death, etc.) their element "dangerous", which once required, for thus giving the illusion that a click, you can have the world in the palm of the hand, and if you have no how, no matter, you can at 6,12,24, 34 months interest free, to enjoy now, pay later.

"I want to work here, because I think a lot of work is not" "he said of the blue a candidate for an assistant in my office, without any labor diplomacy whatsoever. I suspect that no one listened, because someone might hear a little resonable what you are saying. The logic: work less, earn more. Sure! And your snow? Affects respond to that which longs for and can not be acquired immediately, even if they are objects to be bought, but by mediation effort, work and love, honestly for resources to enjoy what rightfully earned. The sensible for its immediacy prefer to take shortcuts, skipping the rail of the legal, sensible being organized evil that lives up to ... No matter how long they will be soon! Obviously why not say so, " most momentous, that hard-won and not a moment. Here some readers, as well as some who writes it, we might think that these speeches are of old, outdated ... of course, at one time believed that human happiness in life was also a dose of pain itself, suffering and effort. While this existence is being produced bipolar designed not only for products that satisfy immediate desires and follies, thirst, hunger, sleep, health, but about the subject .... Reduced to a simple figure, average percentage gain. Subvert this effect is possible, considering that the relationship with time and space, where networks are deployed with others, are taking their logic, their time, efforts .... "There is time for everything" ... but the problems arise when everyone wants to live without restriction or limitation, then there is no edge, the border line, borderline, bipolar, can be read socially as Desperate to have a "brake", a "limit", a border, to organize, comfort and structure, when it is missing, often the body is the border "has something to limit" by contingencies: stress, illness, accident, death ...


Twitter: CamiloRamirez_

http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com

Cool Gift For A Barber

From sadness and melancholy



Camilo Ramírez Garza

"Psychoanalysis does not seek to bring the subject to reality, but rather,

raised at first, how came this thing called reality"

Slavoj Zizek

A

throughout history have been described some experiences where you can appreciate the loss, gradual or sudden interest in people, objects and / or daily activities . Not only did not feel like anything but, maybe, not even feel like they are willing, or not feel like anything, but at least want to want. They have been called by various names: "Melancholy", "Depression", "Sadness in the extreme" to modern inventions biopolitical of psychiatry: mood disorders, "depressive disorder" "Alexithymia." Even a group emerges as the Emos, similar to the former consisting of "Rebel Without a Cause," now "Depressive without cause?"

Regardless of the names or the purpose for which it is concerned (economic interests of the pharmaceutical industry, mental "illness" that clashes with the interests of production and consumption, neurochemical imbalances, disorders of the soul, mind, etc.) rather than questioning, we insist, beyond behavioral symptoms with which is often identify (Do you eat too much / little?, Do you sleep too much / little?, you stopped to do things that previously gave him pleasure? "... assessing the areas of eating, sleeping, sex life, work and social activities, their presence in time: days, months, etc. ) Is the singular expression - sense it - that this presents for those who have suffered, posing not only a change (increase, decrease?) In the "energy, desire, emotion (from Lat. Ex - motion : what moves outside) but an attempt to sizing feels something is missing (what you lose when you lose something / someone
?) Freud not free to take as a benchmark for metapsychology vision energy, also known as "economy", the libidinal, stating that it is likely to increase and decrease, subject to change. Even beyond the letterhead that any "psi" I can give, the sadness and depression, first, show that it is possible to argue all the time "interest", "Desire," "like" ... that tend-as well knows the market and physical-to entropy, not only in sadness, but in the sense of nothing, little explored. Some people just feel nothing. In this line, we mean that there is "" Depression, as a single entity, but sadness, depression in the plural, with the unrepresentable feeling of nothing: What moves a sadness? What is life?

In "Mourning and Melancholia" Freud distinguishes the reaction to loss, grief, melancholy, as those experiences where not only missed something, but do not know what and how much! missed him. While the market knows how much lost depressive employees do not work (illness, stress, absenteeism, tardiness, etc.) As well as how much you can gain from farmacologización of emotions (depression, anxiety, bipolar, etc.). in melancholia, a difficulty to locate bursts has been lost and what can be done to "get" again something that no one even knows for sure who was ... Is not the same logic of addiction calls : to silence the language to display the tangible pleasure of the real body? Do we prefer the tablets to the words? Hence, in tables of "Melancholy" measuring instruments appear, because it is what has been lost dimension not only of the other, but themselves, "How to turn a loss each? What is lost when you lose? What illusions tear their losses? As in a relationship, not only is foreign to another, but something of himself that he had and lost when it feels that the other was: "I have lost something of myself than when I lost you," someone once said.

http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com

Twitter: CamiloRamirez_


[1] article published in the newspaper El Porvenir (12/08/1910) cultural section, p. 3

Saturday, December 11, 2010

Socks For Heavy Runners

UFO Sighting Compiled

After a few months back to post on the blog that you chose;
Here is a compilation of UFO seen in Dean Funes, a year ago and elsewhere in the twentieth century.
This video includes a clip of a light that was traveling at high speed oblique path until it disappeared, it was captured with a Sony Ericsson W580i with maximum zoom. Note that the stars are not to be so small the camera lens.








Most of the material posted on this blog is controversial (The Royal English Academy defines this word as follows: Controversial "What is under discussion and gives rise to conflicting opinions.") This means that everyone can express their point of view and make sure you think about the images or videos displayed here. If you have material or a UFO story, do not hesitate to send it to facucampeon@gmail.com and published citing the name or pseudonym of

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Getting Mechanic License In Ontario

Love: a failure to play these days

"My wife I are still together, because we keep talking,
quarreling and making love"
Sttephen King

Love is not this idyllic, romantic and naive notion of fairy tales; these end
before failure (fra-married, right after getting married), in the ecstasy made "coitus interruptus
of happiness" "And they lived happily ever after" but quite the opposite. It ends before it starts
good, that which is know and express the fleeting smiles
complicit partners, especially of women to see love as just a story "happy."

If anything the only story that shows some of the adventures, mazes and intricacies of love
is "Shrek" filmed by the production company, DreamWorks. Yes, love and its failure,
a dream, dreams are also a dream, as Freud suggested, "is also an embodiment
of desire." Remember that in German, the word "Schreck" metonymic
history of Shrek, means terror, fear, fright. And if all love and love-up, produces a kind of horror
What I do with this I feel? Why am I / you love / or? What
that (I imagine) I have to do to respond / maintain / care / have your love? All love
produces delusions: Does she love me not love me? As well as a close-to kidnapping and extortion
impossible demand exclusivity, stifling: "If you say you love me, let
to see your FRIENDS! "No wonder the arts have referred to love as" a disease
and incurable insanity "(" Love is a great folly and the cure that heals, makes a great
madness ") as a destiny marked by fate ("Romeo and Juliet") impossible love, the perfect match !!...
perfect because they lived together, they put the "black door with three locks
! - just died in ecstasy.

"Love is a failure to play" Why? Because there are failures, difficulties, problems
burst and show you something: in love faults. When I fall for someone
produces something like "Give something you do not have someone who is not" (Jacques Lacan)
You love something in another that is more than himself, is said to be " I ", or something shared: I love something in you that
maybe even you do not see it (or if you're not) and hence many things to do or say
not fit this idea / image / fantasy I guess you (Any assumption
position speaks speaks
whom some regard) thwarted. "Who the hell I fell in love then?!
claim is
-lovers, when they discover that their images do not match the model with
copy. (Eidos / Copy / Drill, orders platonic) and then from there you start the procession
complaints and cries like: "Why can not we be as before?! "
When we started out it was all ...! How will you be able to be as before, without first
knew and did not close, and daily treatment, previously unknown pests, mistakes, failures
himself and the other, everything was perfect, just because nobody knew nobody, had not the element
uncomfortable differences ("Irreconcilable Differences" is it not a major
grounds for divorce?) the closeness ... everything that is producing a kind of
unmasking of the object: it is not (really) as I thought. What thing-tell me-if
is one I thought, as I imagined? At that juncture that some relationships can be completed
, tangling a bit more, or suspended in a pause where no one touches (the
body, words, etc.) That love does not reach the urge to do something that traumatic and / or

annoying the other, perhaps others can find ways to play the game of love and heartbreak
... play with static images with romantic and disappointment as they show what
films "Shrek" where exactly the differences (abnormal, ugly,
amorphous, etc..) Cause rejection of others and of itself, constitute the very thing that makes
loop and symptoms of love, because he loves what the other is also what you hate, is part of the failure
with horror and fascination. I think limited is not participating to some extent
you hate / love the other, hence the poet says: "I hate you hate half the
to keep it to myself" (Sabin)

http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com
Twitter: CamiloRamirez_

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Electric Toothbrush Price Pune

Die

by Camilo Ramírez Garza

¿ Acaso puede protegerme la casa de la muerte?
Jaime Sabines

En México, sobre todo en los estados y ciudades al norte, tal parece que a la única certeza en la vida, la muerte, y su angelical ensueño de causas “naturales”, las personas debemos añadirle las de una muerte cruenta, sea a manos del crimen organizado o del fuego cruzado, o confusiones “daño colateral” a manos del ejercito y/o la policía. Incluso hay quien se ha atrevido a comparar tales muertes, con la noción biopolítica de daños quirúrgicos "Desgraciadamente no se puede hacer in the human body as an operation, ie, surgery without touching the other members, sadly it has, we regret very much that ... " " said the Cardinal of Monterrey, Robles Ortega (El Norte 31/10 / 10) similar to what George W. Bush said the invasion in Iraq, as a preventive surgery, to which many doctors questioned the impossibility of such a notion.

definitely all die someday that's for sure, yet death is always experienced distant, distant, especially when "no reason to live" otherwise Death pervades with its aura of "mortification." As a symptom obsessive thinking, distracting, if not truly protect Traumatic actually pass something, hope, life, risk.

What if we lived aware that one day we will die? Not tragic sense as the poet of "transitory" describing Sigmund Freud, but as a creative possibility, namely that in the places, times and places we tread, others will be those who hold and enjoy, perhaps, of what we now have, of their effects. This would perhaps have other priorities, live slower, lighter, enjoy life: "Nothing you'll get when you leave / when the day is your final / live happy now while you can, maybe tomorrow will not have time to feel awake. ..."-sung the poet and singer Napoleon.

As capitalism, the state and the company want to know anything unusual deaths, their conditions and sufferings, as well as memory and history, for they are bearers of what is done and has done, focuses on "quality of life" rather than its qualities, seeking commodified, profiting from economic and how to minimize its importance by the statistic: "One death is a sad fact, thousands, simple statistics" W. Churchill, death is hence uniquely appealing. There is nothing more human and closer than that (Who do you play the bells?) To think or know someone's death, for more distant it is, it is impossible not to refer to itself, the death of another, my mirror, is somehow their own. As the only possibility to imagine making one's death is like another.

On the other hand, the addition of living death is celebrated, commemorated, announces: How much people do not meet precisely at the funerals of family and friends?! A talk, mourn, remember, tell jokes, laugh, suffer together, until later, dancing, drinking, making love ... just do claim that Heidegger expressed by humans: "We live in death, while dying, life ... hence the cry of the Mexican mischief, apology to life: To eat and suck the world will end! ".

camilormz@gmail.com

Twitter: CamiloRamirez_


* Article published in the newspaper El Porvenir, Cultural, p. 3. October 27, 2010

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

White Discharge In Place Of My Period

subvert the positive-negative circuit


by Camilo Ramírez Garza

"What makes life ends policy

by inexorably closer to its opposite

Michel Foucault

Whenever addresses the positive and negative, it is impossible not refer to the world of mathematics - the lives mathematization? - in particular the number line and dials. Just as the great texts of Nietzsche, "Genealogy of Morals" in which historically focuses on how emerging notions of good and evil, somehow rigged "power-with beauty and wealth, and hence also the health / disease to account for normal / abnormal not only in medical terms, but socio-political and psychological.

Given the tragic features of our country, Mexico, state and city Nuevo León, Monterrey, like many other cities the north, south, east and west ... It seems that the tragedy has spread throughout the country! - would be for many, impossible, not demoralized and assume that the reality is always going to be worse, ie , recognized as "pessimistic." While others, seemingly opposite, positive, try to counteract the bad "vibes" from them. Well, this can not be, because, structurally, both positive and negative, are the same: one is defined by the other, neither can exist in isolation, trying to claim one of them, the more it appears the opposite, wanting to eradicate negativity or pessimism, with ideal-positive arguments only does "grow" more as negativity, as in raising persistently positive, the ideals, the more the subject becomes aware of how far he is to meet this ideal. Something similar happens with the guilt: the more I ponder fulfill my highest ideals, the eradication of guilt, feeling good, the more it strengthens and opens the gap to sink into the reluctance, pessimism and apathy. Thus, paradoxically, nothing is more sad as the positive joy, and there is nothing more joyous than sad. Examples? 1) Cookies bad luck, black humor equivalent of the famous cookies for good luck, application of social network Facebook, which when opened gives you a fatal message paradoxically, ends up producing a lot of joy, 2) the same as the disincentives, comedians making fun of the "well intentioned" positive life attitudes, allowed to leave the circuit networks: positive, negative, optimism-pessimism peace, violence, sentimentality, indifference, etc.. Circuit that encapsulates the subject in a sadness without possibilities, outside the two "negative" positivism. " 3) The game of football, classic stripes and tigers regional body, which was conceived as pro-peace, ended in bickering.

One way to subvert these networks that prevent real change, they always have the idea needs to be changed first, be positive, stop being negative, to change, improve, develop. Leave the circuit is ideal for peace, positivity, etc.. to assume a position des-sentimentality, the way in which, for example, Gandhi and Martin Luther King did: hit command set denouncing his powers, not the sentimentality or positivism (India and suffering of the blacks) but raising their labor rights as citizens, ie, taking the context in which it is generated discomfort is suffering socially, beyond a priori "be" pessimistic, positive, out of that pair equally fruitless, to provide pathways change and transformation social movements via peaceful, really violent in its effectiveness, understanding of violence: the ability to jeopardize an entire nation and empire.


http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com

* Article published in the newspaper El Porvenir (09/15/2010), p.2. Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Best Printer For A Designer In 2010

How to differentiate the sounds?

"In the early days of her marriage ... she appeared in a major sexual assault that was constantly worry that the neighbors could hear a word or a noise through the wall, eventually becoming concerned that distrust of neighbors
Sigmund Freud (1896)

"Is that you hear are fireworks, grenades, a transformer exploded or bursts of AK-47 or AR-15? "I wrote in my Twitter account: CamiloRamirez_ under hastag # chistesbicentenario and" Mama, Mama! What do you hear? "In apparent detonation of a firearm, the mother , trying not to scare your child, says: "Do not worry dear, is your father who ate beans again with broccoli sauce" Situations condense part of the everyday noise of the citizens of northern states of Mexico, who terrified looking to break through deal not only with crime and insecurity, but with crushing impact: can not get out / work / study / fun / love / travel .. comfortable. Right here comes the humor in general, and black humor in particular, to a transaction suffered from fear, can-style circus jugglers sol-subvert the fear, making it laughs and possibilities.

In the second story the mother counteracts the effects of terror, lying to his son in the style of "Life Is Beautiful" (Italy, 1997) Recall briefly the plot of the film: a tender father brings his young son hide from the atrocities of the Holocaust at the hands of the Nazis. To do so, the operation of the joke: it takes certain elements already present in history (prison, barracks, soldiers, tanks, dead) articulating new items from them, which produce a different story than the first. The intervention makes a loving father-and mother-up of the joke as he speaks to his son, where for the child is a game where everyone must earn points to win the tank soldiers, and for this should keep quiet, work, do not bother the guards hold back and not eating. Appear that "Life is not what one lived, but one remembers to tell it" Gabriel García Márquez. Speaking as

fantasies, referring not only to interpret reality, but to build it. Another effect of the media / fears in people who have never heard a gun blast, but the hundreds of news about shootings and executions, is how the ear is overwhelmed by an erotic nature of fate ("How to differentiate sounds? 1 and Part 2 "El Porvenir, 11 and August 25 http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com/ )" is a shootout, they come for me! ... considering that the persecution is absolute and the imminent harm, we need to protect life and possessions at all costs. Things that just, you never have at all (life and things) and always threaten to be lost or affected. If we fear both insecurity and death is just the importance of charge (charge for life) as they are not living the moment, only live in the future, so death was always uncomfortable experience, and not as something that is a party, not the future or past life, but of this, the moment. Or Does the drug invented death, insecurity, the contingencies of life?

camilormz@gmail.com http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com/ .

* Article published in El Porvenir, September 8, 2010

Friday, September 3, 2010

Why Do My Timberland Boots Hurt

Part 3 How to differentiate the sounds?


security / insecurity is paradoxical: the more one looks, more produces its opposite,
insecurity. Something similar happens with guilt and solutions "motivational": the more you
wants to "do the right thing, the ideal" to not feel guilt, more is reaffirmed.
The more secure you want to be / remain, it is most vulnerable. As the lady referred to
Freud, carrying lots of packages, and for wanting to hold, he dropped one, when you try to pick
, others fell off, leans back, wanting to take them and escape him
others ... The same applies in reverse: to recognize the vulnerability allows
compensate some lost security, do not get hijacked by fear "absolutely, go ahead
. The fear is imaginary: it is feared more what could / might happen than what happened last
/ happens.

A practical consequence arising from such experiences, as shown
psychoanalytic knowledge: the best way to protect yourself is hidden from view, the style of "The letter
stolen" Edgar Allan Poe. The same strategy of humor and a joke, let
say the unspeakable: the truth. As experiences where, "taking the dead" fought a running
; say "Wrong number or" You españoul hablou nou "to answer the phone and receive
rant of someone who sought to extort money. Are responses occur
instantly, can not be calculated nor plan, nor can offer as a "tips" of
security, "You must do this or that" they are as to blame: no one can
executed, the ideal approach, leaving most vulnerable ("Chin .. I could not, if he had
said ...") After a security conference, someone said, "Now if I have
very scared, I knew that all this had to do to be sure." As technological advances
while we allow some independence from the "nature" more
condition. Not enough to install surveillance cameras (closed circuit)
also never have good resolution, once they are in operation,
should hire someone to go to see them. Or the door full of locks, locks and windows
panoramic, pins, keys, security ... all devices
prevent them trying to pass someone
of a threat ... "Can he protect the house of death?"
(Jaime Sabines) How do you protect yourself? Who? Who threatens and stalks,
outsiders or insiders? If insurance is created because it operates under the illusion "in" and "outside"
The movie "When a Stranger Calls" (When a Stranger Calls, USA, 2006) shows
continuous surface between inside and outside their topology (ver. Banda de Moebius)
the real threats are "inside" understanding in psychoanalytically
as those located on the outside, on the surface: the discourse of fear of the media /
fears, the state discourse referent (screenplay) required the work of organized crime.
One of the discomforts that occur in Monterrey, NL, as in many cities
Mexico, is about what you hear, not only during the day, but especially at night. (Ver.
Ramírez-Garza, C. How to differentiate sounds? Part 1. El Porvenir 08/25/1910) Terror
sound is all noise (firecrackers, fireworks, exploding transformer
car ... even the same gunfire and grenades) has been invested by
erotically
fate (come for us, we are going to kill, kidnap ... the end has come!) So
as love enters through the ears, fear itself does outpace bodies. For this the sensations
security / insecurity could also be read as an irruption of
a feature of erotomania, the "anxiety / fear / fascination with the destruction, chaos and death;
a way to live life erotic times of war and death. (Continued in Part 3)

camilormz@gmail.com
http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Lump In Between Cheek

Part 2 How to differentiate the sounds? Part 1


poe
Camilo Ramírez Garza

Twitter: CamiloRamirez_

time ago I was on a cruise. Nearby recarpeteo work performed. The traffic light changed and progressed a little slow, having a crash. Later, in the afternoon, watching the news I hear that I was a few meters from the persecution and execution! Only then I realized that the sounds were not from hammers, but machine guns. It was right where fear broke: "And what if I had ..." . A good friend talked that, having dinner with his family in a restaurant, heard a loud bang. Only he and who took the order seemed to know that it was a grenade. The rest of the table, continued as usual. Last Sunday in Monterrey, NL., Event was held in fireworks, many fireworks are thundered. In the various social networks many asked with concern what it was. Interestingly, a day before someone threw a grenade at Televisa Monterrey facilities. Another commented that a neighbor heard a hammering, and at first thought it was gunfire. The next day someone said: "It is not least we are all flaky, anything can happen by a grenade or gunfire. Now any sound passing through a grenade or gunfire. How these sounds (explosions of transformers, drills, someone hammering something with a hammer, etc.) Are "captured" by one: the burst of shrapnel, grenade?

Humans not only captures the physical energy (light-light, ear-sound, taste, smell, chemicals, touch, temperature, pressure, movement), but we interpret it, make sense, we lost the regulatory instinctive indicating that biologically before being and needs to be done. By losing the natural order, we create the artifice of language and everything to guide us or disoriented (culture: religion, law, arts, science, information -medios/miedos) we became humans as speakers, artificial, dependent and affected by words and images that attempt to complete the body, sexuality, life, happiness, future, etc.. In that sense, the item actually impossible to symbolize the human body chaos, contingency, what is not known, attempts to delineate by what you can imagine and think about what happened, happens and will happen ( "They say what really happened was ...") The terror experienced many people in Mexico, especially in the northern states of Nuevo Leon, Tamaulipas, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Sonora, etc. arises where the life, integrity and security. Thus we can say that we are witnessing the paranoización of life: every sound becomes a sign of certainty ("They will come for me, kill me, we are all at risk") When Freud invented psychoanalysis to early s. XX, then the neurosis organized life of cities and families (head function decline of the father, the social order, etc..) Now at the loss of the most elementary safety, all rave in an attempt to make sense , order and protection. Just at a point where the work of the State are ineffective, if not nil, to fulfill one of its basic functions: to ensure the safety of its citizens. Instead he sees officers (transit, police, special forces, army, navy ...) feels more at risk.

disaffected One way to be taken by terror, is just noticing the effects on the body of the discourses of terror (media / fears, authorities, etc..), Which refine the way you listen and live day day, for fear is always greater than what might happen than what actually happens. When something happens, then you can calculate and prepare something, an answer find a solution. When nothing happened, then the fear is just imagine a whole range of possibilities.

camilormz@gmail.com

http://columnacamilo.jimdo.com

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

What Is The Difference Between Ultra Hd Flip

what Eclipse is female desire

po r

Camilo Ramírez Garza

psychoanalyst

Twitter: CamiloRamirez_

In the film, recently released, "Eclipse" (USA, 2010) attended the presentation of something fundamental, which organizes around fantasies of women and love. On one side is named an Eclipse: Who eclipsing whom? "Jacob to Edward? Jacob Edward "? None of that, it really overshadows - and both-is the desire of women: what Bella wants, even beyond herself.

And what do you want (B) she? ...

Everyone tries to answer the question: Charlie, his father -Which is not even named as such, want (B) she is not with Edward, but Jacob, until it learns the sex of the first convention, that his daughter is still a virgin, as his "pale" in love, want to wait to be married to have sex. Jacob and Edward, believe "respond" to the question by telling a (B) it seems somewhat similar, with their differences: "Whoever you want is me."

However, Edward, but Jacob is warning him to "lead" to which (B) she wants, regardless of their desire to "selfish" vampire (reducing the other to one blood to take. In this sense, love is always something vampire), stepping aside, allowing (B) she do something she wants, love ... or the last straw, to warm the cold with Jacob, for there is something that she loves Edward more than himself. Hence, a position he takes before (B) it is of no force. Incuse Jacob tells him, he understood that if he wants that (B) she is with him, you have to let her decide. Thing very well also warns Jacob, pus try to play the same letter, saying that Edward just wants to control it, than to (B) it will be appropriate it. As if he did not want same! But (B) she, like Alice in Wonderland, learns his lesson, warning that does not have to blend in with any guy (wolf or vampire): to be what this mean that she wants, but play this game but at the same time do what you want. Since she makes it clear he does not want to be a vampire by Edward, but by something beyond it. Experience any thing in love when he discovers that for which your partner / to love, always something that once appointed, is reduced, if not transcended the subject (That you love me, Rebaza me! " I have to comply with what they see in me and made me fall in love?! dimension the growth of love trap)

Edward also had a time of "Jacob" but got over it. Not for nothing, Jacob, as any good apprentice love, while (B) she sleeps, see Edward, how you managed to give up (B) and leave it? Well, now he walks in them: he knows he awaits the inevitable: (B) she will choose Edward From the perspective of Jacob, masculine logic: I rejected my (for poor mens least silly, etc. ) and chose him (immortal, cool, educated, etc..) but also captures what (B) it feels like to be with Edward.

(B) she does not choose to become a vampire just by Edward, - "dead fly" it was not so dead-Edward As well might say to Jacob, "You think we're fine, I'm happy with it But look, I just said that not even going to turn into a vampire just for me, so I too share your love with something else: something that is beyond me: being a vampire, "what that entails for (B) it.

However, Edward, by his powers, he knows these elements, thought that Bella can not accept for themselves, so that Jacob knows the way the body: Bella also loves him. Why not get angry when (B) she kisses Jacob, because he knows he has to leave, did not eclipse.

psychoanalytically could say that Edward has access / knowledge to the Unconscious (B) it. Could, at least one, Logar answer Freud's question What does a woman want? .. We'll see where it leads to that elsewhere. While Jacob, regardless of language as it is in words and thought, feeling (sensing) how she feels when he throws the round and not dogs, but wolves.

aside

male fantasy about women (what Charlie, Jacob, Edward raised a (B) thereof) alone, perhaps, the irrepressible hunger, ravenous hunger of the vampire, its static presence in time and space, which cuts through eternity, is closer than (B) she wants: " I've never felt part of, however with you I feel I belong to something "words-words less, Edward tells Bella, in this third part, on why his conversion, on why you want to be a vampire . Not even draw blood, as experienced as something that will go through (being hungry newly converted) To which Edward replies, half heartbroken, "It's not me. I thought it was for me " (Who wants to be a vampire) Typical response of one who believed that "it was the whole object of desire for someone" and not just something, like when someone says, "I want just because you do ..." (an instrument, part-object, etc. ) that exceeded even himself, reducing it. This formula also applies to Jacob, neither is he who wants to be or cease to be human to become a wolf or vampire. As it is clear that (B) she does not, of course, be part of the pack "pack of wolves: be one with the forest, become one with all, as would be the subject AVATAR.

Therefore, it is not fantasy men on femininity, what man fantasizes (supposed) that women fantasize and want [1] : a whole man, composed of an animal, bestial, and bearing scented man, shirtless, hot, ready to "keep quiet" and bask (Jacob in his wolf reduction, simple sexual energy, while brute force childishly cute, a puppy who caress, a giant dog to carry arm, the style of Paris Hilton, socialite Hollywood) with its counterpart, the gentleman, gentle vampire, full of stories and worlds (Edward, plated the old, follows all protocols, "gives the ring before giving him the ring, cool, polite ...) But what uncontrollably (B) she wants: to be part of the vampire clan, possessing itself that exceeds it and located in vampires. We may anticipate with certainty, that when (B) it achieves that it will have to be a vampire, Edward will not matter much. For (B) she loves anything beyond what Edward is - Is it otherwise could love? That seems to be clear Edward, stepping aside, allowing not be everything to her, which would be very naive, waiting to be everything to someone, do not settle for just being something enough, to be an important part in his life, his history.

And to the question "Why not stay with Jacob? ... Would respond with the same simple formula: for (B) she wanted to be a wolf, but a vampire.

July 13, 2010

http://camiloramirez.jimdo.com

camilormz @ gmail.com



[1] As the well-known joke: How many animals need a woman? A tiger in bed, a jaguar in the garage, a donkey to carry things, and an ox to pay everything. That seems to be rather the male fantasy of femininity, so that even women "buy" as what they want in a man. View movie remake, "The hell with the devil" ( Bedazzled, USA, 2000) where the central character also arises how and why you want a woman, always starting with what he imagines he wants a woman captured women from man's fantasy.